In the corporate world today, financial stress is one of the few things you have to accept one way or another. Debt defaults whether triggered by a topsy-turvy market, pandemic workflow obstacles, or a slowdown in the world economy hit companies and their lenders where it hurts. When such situations arise, the problem needs to be solved in a structured way in a fair manner, and India came up with the idea of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). This has led to a much easier way to be able to go through dispute resolution, giving the creditors and borrowers alike a mechanism that allows financial distress to be effectively and constructively processed.

In this blog, we will discuss what the IBC settlement route is, how it works, the way it changes the game of debt, and why creditors & businesses stand to gain from it.

Recognizing the IBC Route for Settlements

Now that we have some context, let us answer the most important question: what is IBC route settlement?

To put it very simply, the IBC settlement provision provides for a consensual resolution between the parties—usually corporate debtors and financial or operational creditors—after parties have filed proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Both sides can settle and withdraw petitions, subject to approval by adjudicating authorities such as the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) — And at the appellate level, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) — Instead of dragging the case through protracted insolvency proceedings.

This provides a compromise between securing the rights of creditors and allowing the debtor to restructure without the costs of protracted litigation.

Why Settlements — The IBC Route makes a difference

Historically, financial dispute resolution came with a long, judicial route, debt recovery tribunals, or out-of-court settlements that offered no real enforcement. The IBC route settlements bring in a formal, time-bound, and legally enforceable merit to the Union of all the stakeholders:

For creditors: Faster recuperation of dues.

For the debtors: It offers them the option to restructure their liabilities and revive their business.

For the economy: It helps in minimising non-performing assets (NPAs) and robust financial markets.

IBC Process for Loan Settlement

These are the major steps in the IBC process for loan settlement.

Insolvency Application Filing: It is the stage at which creditors or corporate debtors file an insolvency application in the NCLT settlement via IBC.

Admission and Moratorium: It helps provide breathing space. Moreover, a moratorium period is imposed by the NCLT on the debtor once it is admitted hence, no suits or recovery will be filed against the debtor.

Scope for Settlement: The party may try to settle either during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) stage itself or before it.

Withdrawal under Section 12A of IBC: Post-settlement, the application can be withdrawn under Section 12A with the consent of 90% of the Committee of Creditors(CoC).

NCLT or NCLAT Approval: After the settlement, the tribunal (NCLT), or in case of any appeal, the appellate tribunal (NCLAT) confirms the settlement and terminates the insolvency proceedings.

This way, the opposition, which can last for years, ends very fast, and creditors get their money back and enterprises get back to work on the day after or even the same day.

Judgments on Settlement under IBC and NCLT, NCLAT

Final settlement approvals lie with the NCLT & NCLAT settlement agreements IBC. They make certain that the terms of contracts are valid and present no harm to creditors as a whole.

NCLT Settlement through IBC: Once both the companies and the creditors have mutually settled down on the terms of repayment, they often approach the NCLT as the appropriate forum to validate their settlement.

NCLAT-Approved Settlement Agreements under IBC: Furthermore, where an appeal is filed to the NCLAT agreeable to the provisions specified under the IBC, seeking directions in relation to the terms / validity of a settlement entered into, here too, the principles of finality would be applicable.

Thus, in practice, their engagement bestows legal validity upon any settlements, which become enforceable with full transparency.

A New Approach to Debt Resolution Through IBC

Probably the most useful aspect of the IBC route settlements is helping in the case of debt resolutions. Here’s how:

Time-bound framework: Settlements under IBC ensure timely resolution as they are bound by timelines best suited to prevent delays apart from the timelines set under conventional litigation.

Resolution maximizes value: Creditors typically receive a greater value from a settlement than they would receive from a liquidation in which assets would sell for disparately lower prices.

Business continuity: Borrowers are not closed for good but restructured, meaning jobs and operations carry on.

Force in negotiations: The risk of insolvency is so significant that it is in the interest of debtors to negotiate in good faith.

With these advantages, IBC acts as a crucial tool in the enhancement of credit culture in India.

When To Use An IBC Route To Settle Practical Scenarios?

The IBC route is chosen by businesses in situations such as:

• Corporate defaults slow down repayments to financial institutions.
• If you are an operational creditor (for example, using suppliers or service providers) and you were not able to recover your dues.
• Temporary liquidity crisis in companies is looking for some saddles to renegotiate the loans
• Conflicts where settlements from both parties are quicker and cheaper than the judicial procedure.

Dependency on the IBC Path for Settlements– The Challenges

Although IBC route settlements are an effective solution, they come with it own set of problems:

Procedural complexity: Sometimes the process takes longer, as it needs 90% creditor approval

Expenses: Filing fees, professional costs, and adjudicator fees may be prohibitive for smaller entities.

Risk of misuse: There have been instances where adding pressure for settlement by filing for insolvency has been misused.

Bottom Line

The way in which India resolves corporate debt has changed with the IBC route for settlements. It balances creditor rights with business survival chances by creating a clear, enforceable, and time-bound way to resurrect financially distressed firms. This route has protected the interests of stakeholders while ensuring macroeconomic stability, either through NCLT settlement through IBC or NCLT settlement via IBC.

For those considering structured settlements for financial settlements or need expert help navigating the settlements of the IBC route settlements, the team at Hectagon provides clarity and guidance powered by rich expertise in identifiable debt resolution strategies.

FAQs